❄️ Snowfall

Weekend Snow Accumulation Forecast

Site Through 4am Saturday Through 4am Sunday Weekend Snow Accumulation (4pm Thursday through 4am Monday 16 Mar)
Mt. Baker (4500')0-2"0-2"0-2"
Washington Pass3-6"3-6"3-6"
Stevens Pass (4500')0"0"0"
Hurricane Ridge0-1"0-1"0-1"
Blewett Pass0"0"0"
Snoqualmie Pass0"0"0"
Crystal (5000')0"0"0"
Paradise0-2"0-2"0-2"
White Pass (5000')0"0"0"

🧊 Freezing Level

  • Friday: 7000-9000 feet (strong north-south gradient)
  • Saturday: 2000-4000feet
  • Sunday: 2000-4000 feet (rise in evening)

🎿 Our Recommendations

Best Choice This Weekend: Southern British Columbia

After this week of rain nuked any good, accessible snow, it's time to head a bit north. While driving far into thr Canadian coastal range or Rockies will be the best bet, there may be some fun to be had at Whistler on Saturday. I also have a hunch that there could be a bit of snow to play around with in Manning Park, just north of North Cascades National Park. Check it out if you're willing to drive!

Runner-Up: Washington Pass

It's risky given access limitations (unless you have a sled), but Washington Pass might be in the right location to see a decent coating on top of the mush. I can't say the snow will be good to ski, but it might be servicable.

Before we go, a quick detour to ask does rain actually melt our snowpack?

This week's AR dumped an egregious amount of rain on the snowpack we built last weekend — and yes, snow definitely melted. But is the rain directly to blame? Not really. The physics are counterintuitive enough to be worth a quick detour.

Rain heat input vs. condensation latent heat

During a rain on snow event, the snowpack is a cold surface sitting in warm, saturated air. Ignoring net radiation (which is a rather big assumption here, but stick with me), there are two other ways energy reaches it: the heat carried by the rain itself, and the latent heat released when water vapor condenses directly onto the snow surface. The second one wins by a mile.

Using rough estimates for a site at ~1,500 m elevation with 5°C air, 100% humidity, 1 mm/hr of rain, and 3 m/s winds:

Rain heat input (Qr). One millimeter of rain per hour is 1 kg of water at 5°C landing on 0°C snow. Cooling through a 5 K temperature difference doesn't yield much:

Qr = 1 kg/m²/hr × 4,186 J/kg·K × 5 K = ~21,000 J/m²/hr → 0.06 mm w.e./hr melt

Condensation latent heat (QE). Warm saturated air at 5°C has a vapor pressure of ~872 Pa; the 0°C snow surface sits at ~611 Pa. That gradient, stirred by wind, drives vapor to condense directly onto the snow. When it does, every kilogram of condensed vapor releases 2,500,000 J — the latent heat of vaporization. That's ~600× the energy per kilogram compared to simply cooling liquid water by one degree:

Δq = 0.622 × (872 − 611) Pa / 84,100 Pa ≈ 0.0019 kg/kg
QE = 1.05 × 2,500,000 × 0.002 × 3 m/s × 0.0019 = ~30 W/m² → 0.33 mm w.e./hr melt
Rain heat input
0.06
mm w.e./hr melt
Baseline —
Condensation latent heat
0.33
mm w.e./hr melt
~5× more melt than rain
Rain heat input
0.06
mm w.e./hr
Condensation
0.33
mm w.e./hr
What about turbulent sensible heat? The wind also transfers heat directly from warm air to the snowpack (QH), contributing another ~32 W/m² under these conditions — roughly comparable to the condensation term. So rain is actually the smallest of the three melt drivers during a warm, windy AR event. That's left for a separate post.

The bottom line: melt during rain-on-snow events is driven by warm, humid, windy air — not precipitation volume. The rain is just along for the ride.

Estimates use a bulk aerodynamic approach (Ce = 0.002, neutral stability), standard atmosphere at 1,500 m (P = 84,100 Pa), and Magnus formula saturation vapor pressures. Rough numbers — intended as illustration, not a precise forecast.

⚠️ Safety & Travel Notes

  • For avalanche forecasts: Check NWAC.us before any backcountry travel.
  • Road Conditions: For latest road conditions, check WSDOT for current conditions.