❄️ Snowfall

Weekend Snow Accumulation Forecast

Site Through 4am Saturday Through 4am Sunday Weekend Snow Accumulation (4pm Thursday through 4am Monday 30 Mar)
Mt. Baker (4500')0"0"2-6"
Washington Pass0"0"0-3"
Stevens Pass (4500')0"0"0-3"
Hurricane Ridge0"0"0-3"
Blewett Pass0"0"0-1"
Snoqualmie Pass0"0"0-3"
Crystal (5000')0"0"0-3"
Paradise0"0"1-4"
White Pass (5000')0"0"0-2"

🧊 Freezing Level

  • Friday: 6000-8000 feet (strong north-south gradient)
  • Saturday: 5000-7000 feet (drop in afternoon)
  • Sunday: 3000-4000 feet

🎿 Our Recommendations

Best Choice This Weekend: Harvesting Corn at Paradise/Crystal and south

I think the late-March sun will win the battle against the high clouds Saturday and produce some half-decent corn in places that received less snow this week.

Runner-Up: High north facing near Stevens Pass

I'm not as confident in this one since the new snow will have seen warm sunny days on both Thursday and Friday before the weekend. That being said, if you find a particularly well protected north facing aspect at mid or upper elevations in this zone, you might score.

Before we go, a quick detour to ask does rain actually melt our snowpack?

This week's AR dumped an egregious amount of rain on the snowpack we built last weekend — and yes, snow definitely melted. But is the rain directly to blame? Not really. The physics are counterintuitive enough to be worth a quick detour.

Rain heat input vs. condensation latent heat

During a rain on snow event, the snowpack is a cold surface sitting in warm, saturated air. Ignoring net radiation (which is a rather big assumption here, but stick with me), there are two other ways energy reaches it: the heat carried by the rain itself, and the latent heat released when water vapor condenses directly onto the snow surface. The second one wins by a mile.

Using rough estimates for a site at ~1,500 m elevation with 5°C air, 100% humidity, 1 mm/hr of rain, and 3 m/s winds:

Rain heat input (Qr). One millimeter of rain per hour is 1 kg of water at 5°C landing on 0°C snow. Cooling through a 5 K temperature difference doesn't yield much:

Qr = 1 kg/m²/hr × 4,186 J/kg·K × 5 K = ~21,000 J/m²/hr → 0.06 mm w.e./hr melt

Condensation latent heat (QE). Warm saturated air at 5°C has a vapor pressure of ~872 Pa; the 0°C snow surface sits at ~611 Pa. That gradient, stirred by wind, drives vapor to condense directly onto the snow. When it does, every kilogram of condensed vapor releases 2,500,000 J — the latent heat of vaporization. That's ~600× the energy per kilogram compared to simply cooling liquid water by one degree:

Δq = 0.622 × (872 − 611) Pa / 84,100 Pa ≈ 0.0019 kg/kg
QE = 1.05 × 2,500,000 × 0.002 × 3 m/s × 0.0019 = ~30 W/m² → 0.33 mm w.e./hr melt
Rain heat input
0.06
mm w.e./hr melt
Baseline —
Condensation latent heat
0.33
mm w.e./hr melt
~5× more melt than rain
Rain heat input
0.06
mm w.e./hr
Condensation
0.33
mm w.e./hr
What about turbulent sensible heat? The wind also transfers heat directly from warm air to the snowpack (QH), contributing another ~32 W/m² under these conditions — roughly comparable to the condensation term. So rain is actually the smallest of the three melt drivers during a warm, windy AR event. That's left for a separate post.

The bottom line: melt during rain-on-snow events is driven by warm, humid, windy air — not precipitation volume. The rain is just along for the ride.

Estimates use a bulk aerodynamic approach (Ce = 0.002, neutral stability), standard atmosphere at 1,500 m (P = 84,100 Pa), and Magnus formula saturation vapor pressures. Rough numbers — intended as illustration, not a precise forecast.

⚠️ Safety & Travel Notes

  • For avalanche forecasts: Check NWAC.us before any backcountry travel.
  • Road Conditions: For latest road conditions, check WSDOT for current conditions.